ITLDC vs Trabia
Real-test comparison — higher score is better on every metric (0–100).
Amsterdam
Chișinău
| ITLDC | Metric | Trabia |
|---|---|---|
|
64.3
|
Overall |
64.8
|
|
89.9
|
Ping |
100.0
|
|
84.9
|
Network speed |
31.9
|
|
18.7
|
CPU |
27.9
|
|
40.6
|
Memory |
83.4
|
|
72.5
|
Disk |
90.8
|
| 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM | Configuration | 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM |
On the overall score ITLDC and Trabia are level: 64.3 vs 64.8 out of 100. A gap of 0.5 points is smaller than the spread between individual passes, so calling an outright winner would be dishonest — look at the individual categories below.
ITLDC is stronger on network speed; Trabia — on ping, CPU, memory and disk.
What that means in practice: for a game server, VPN and anything latency-sensitive, Trabia is the closer fit; for a database and write-heavy work — Trabia; for file delivery, streaming and backups — ITLDC; for builds, encryption and compute-bound tasks — Trabia.
Where the numbers come from: the best published test of ITLDC was taken in Netherlands on the 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM plan, Trabia — in Moldova on the 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM plan. The locations differ, so compare ping and speed with care: they say as much about the route to our control endpoints as about the server itself.
Important: this compares the best published test of each provider, not an average across all their servers. Every result is a snapshot of one machine on the test date — on another node, or a month later, the numbers may differ. The scoring method and raw logs are public, so you can check them yourself.