Best VPS by Memory
Providers ranked by measured memory bandwidth.
Developer cloud · SSD droplets · global datacenters
| # | Provider | Score | Relative | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
100.0 |
|
5 tests |
| 2 |
|
96.3 |
|
1 test |
| 3 |
|
92.1 |
|
1 test |
| 4 |
|
87.1 |
|
1 test |
| 5 |
|
84.2 |
|
2 tests |
| 6 |
|
83.4 |
|
1 test |
| 7 |
|
82.9 |
|
1 test |
| 8 | T Timeweb | 78.0 |
|
2 tests |
| 9 |
|
52.0 |
|
13 tests |
| 10 |
|
45.5 |
|
10 tests |
| 11 |
|
40.6 |
|
3 tests |
| 12 |
|
35.5 |
|
7 tests |
| 13 |
|
33.3 |
|
1 test |
VPS memory: bandwidth matters, not capacity
Memory here means RAM bandwidth, not capacity. It is the bottleneck less often than disk or network, which is why it carries less weight in the overall score. For databases and caching, though, it decides.
Every server goes through the same set of tests with the same agent. Key tests run three times, the median counts, and the spread across attempts is published separately — it says as much about stability as raw speed does.
The selection holds 13 hosts, led by Vultr at 100.0. The gap between first and last is 66.7 points. That is a lot: the choice here genuinely matters rather than being a matter of taste.
A score is 0–100 within a comparable group, not an absolute value. It is computed half as a position among others and half against a reference «poor → excellent» scale, so the only slow server in a small sample does not get an undeserved zero.
Best VPS for a task
See the methodology for how scores are computed (version 2026.07b).