Serva One vs Timeweb
Real-test comparison — higher score is better on every metric (0–100).
Sofia
Amsterdam
| Serva One | Metric | Timeweb |
|---|---|---|
|
63.8
|
Overall |
58.2
|
|
98.4
|
Ping |
100.0
|
|
22.8
|
Network speed |
11.5
|
|
58.9
|
CPU |
39.6
|
|
43.7
|
Memory |
78.0
|
|
84.6
|
Disk |
72.7
|
| 4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM | Configuration | 2 vCPU · 6 GB RAM |
On the overall score Serva One is ahead: 63.8 vs 58.2 out of 100 — a gap of 5.7 points. But the overall score blends five categories with different weights, and your workload may only care about one of them.
Serva One is stronger on network speed, CPU and disk; Timeweb — on memory. On ping the difference is within noise — treat them as equal there.
What that means in practice: for a database and write-heavy work — Serva One; for file delivery, streaming and backups — Serva One; for builds, encryption and compute-bound tasks — Serva One.
Where the numbers come from: the best published test of Serva One was taken in Bulgaria on the 4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM plan, Timeweb — in Netherlands on the 2 vCPU · 6 GB RAM plan. The locations differ, so compare ping and speed with care: they say as much about the route to our control endpoints as about the server itself.
Important: this compares the best published test of each provider, not an average across all their servers. Every result is a snapshot of one machine on the test date — on another node, or a month later, the numbers may differ. The scoring method and raw logs are public, so you can check them yourself.