Verified
17 July 2026
Serva One·4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM·Bulgaria
Overall
63.8
/ 100
Scores
0–100 vs comparable servers
Ping
98.4/100
Speed
22.8/100
CPU
58.9/100
Memory
43.7/100
Disk
84.6/100
Category scores
Internet speed
Ping to control points
CPU performance
Memory bandwidth
Disk — random IOPS
Disk — sequential throughput
Disk latency (p95 / p99)
Network
| download_speed | 353.6 | Mbps |
| upload_speed | 196.7 | Mbps |
| ping_cloudflare | 3.338 | ms |
| ping_google | 1.092 | ms |
| ping_quad9 | 36.059 | ms |
| mtu | 1,500 |
Disk
| random_4k_read_iops | 119,537 | IOPS |
| random_4k_read_bw | 466.9 | MB/s |
| random_4k_read_lat_p95 | 0.428 | ms |
| random_4k_read_lat_p99 | 0.578 | ms |
| random_4k_write_iops | 107,901 | IOPS |
| random_4k_write_bw | 421.5 | MB/s |
| random_4k_write_lat_p95 | 0.449 | ms |
| random_4k_write_lat_p99 | 0.627 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_iops | 11,609 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_read_bw | 11,608.8 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p95 | 1.319 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p99 | 2.056 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_iops | 2,035 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_write_bw | 2,034.6 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p95 | 4.751 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p99 | 13.828 | ms |
CPU
| sysbench_single | 920.57 | events/s |
| sysbench_multi | 3,641.67 | events/s |
| gzip_compress | 138.1 | MB/s |
Memory
| memory_write_mb_s | 17,386.62 | MiB/s |
| memory_read_mb_s | 21,333.33 | MiB/s |
| OS | Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS |
| Kernel | 5.15.0-177-generic |
| Virtualization | kvm |
| CPU model | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ |
| vCPU | 4 |
| RAM (MB) | 7937 |
| Disk (GB) | 39.3 |
| Agent | 1.1.0 |
| Scoring | 2026.07b |
Exactly what the agent returned from this server — before rounding, with nothing edited out. Every number above is computed from this. Open separately →
Loading…
Could not load the data.
Plain-language summary
Serva One (4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM) was measured in Sofia, Bulgaria — the real numbers are below. The standout here is storage — 85/100, backed by 119,537 IOPS (4K read). On the other hand, the memory subsystem lags behind (21,333 MiB/s). The disk result makes it a reasonable choice for storage-heavy or I/O-bound services. As always, the numbers reflect this exact instance on the test date and may vary by node.