Edis vs Serva One
Real-test comparison — higher score is better on every metric (0–100).
Saint Petersburg
Sofia
| Edis | Metric | Serva One |
|---|---|---|
|
39.9
|
Overall |
63.8
|
|
73.4
|
Ping |
98.4
|
|
33.9
|
Network speed |
22.8
|
|
14.6
|
CPU |
58.9
|
|
33.3
|
Memory |
43.7
|
|
39.3
|
Disk |
84.6
|
| 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM | Configuration | 4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM |
On the overall score Serva One is ahead: 63.8 vs 39.9 out of 100 — a gap of 24 points. But the overall score blends five categories with different weights, and your workload may only care about one of them.
Edis is stronger on network speed; Serva One — on ping, CPU, memory and disk.
What that means in practice: for a game server, VPN and anything latency-sensitive, Serva One is the closer fit; for a database and write-heavy work — Serva One; for file delivery, streaming and backups — Edis; for builds, encryption and compute-bound tasks — Serva One.
Where the numbers come from: the best published test of Edis was taken in Russia on the 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM plan, Serva One — in Bulgaria on the 4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM plan. The locations differ, so compare ping and speed with care: they say as much about the route to our control endpoints as about the server itself.
Important: this compares the best published test of each provider, not an average across all their servers. Every result is a snapshot of one machine on the test date — on another node, or a month later, the numbers may differ. The scoring method and raw logs are public, so you can check them yourself.