Edis vs Ghostnet
Real-test comparison — higher score is better on every metric (0–100).
Saint Petersburg
Frankfurt
| Edis | Metric | Ghostnet |
|---|---|---|
|
39.9
|
Overall |
78.6
|
|
73.4
|
Ping |
76.9
|
|
33.7
|
Network speed |
65.2
|
|
14.8
|
CPU |
83.2
|
|
33.8
|
Memory |
96.3
|
|
39.4
|
Disk |
81.6
|
| 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM | Configuration | 2 vCPU · 2 GB RAM |
On the overall score Ghostnet is ahead: 78.6 vs 39.9 out of 100 — a gap of 38.6 points. But the overall score blends five categories with different weights, and your workload may only care about one of them.
Ghostnet — on ping, network speed, CPU, memory and disk.
What that means in practice: for a game server, VPN and anything latency-sensitive, Ghostnet is the closer fit; for a database and write-heavy work — Ghostnet; for file delivery, streaming and backups — Ghostnet; for builds, encryption and compute-bound tasks — Ghostnet.
Where the numbers come from: the best published test of Edis was taken in Russia on the 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM plan, Ghostnet — in Germany on the 2 vCPU · 2 GB RAM plan. The locations differ, so compare ping and speed with care: they say as much about the route to our control endpoints as about the server itself.
Important: this compares the best published test of each provider, not an average across all their servers. Every result is a snapshot of one machine on the test date — on another node, or a month later, the numbers may differ. The scoring method and raw logs are public, so you can check them yourself.