Verified
21 September 2026
Ghostnet·2 vCPU · 2 GB RAM·Germany
Overall
78.6
/ 100
Scores
0–100 vs comparable servers
Ping
76.9/100
Speed
65.2/100
CPU
83.2/100
Memory
96.3/100
Disk
81.6/100
Category scores
Internet speed
Ping to control points
CPU performance
Memory bandwidth
Disk — random IOPS
Disk — sequential throughput
Disk latency (p95 / p99)
Network
| download_speed | 1,352.9 | Mbps |
| mtu | 1,500 | |
| ping_cloudflare | 3.939 | ms |
| ping_google | 3.578 | ms |
| ping_quad9 | 3.836 | ms |
| upload_speed | 240.4 | Mbps |
Disk
| random_4k_read_bw | 603 | MB/s |
| random_4k_read_iops | 154,365 | IOPS |
| random_4k_read_lat_p95 | 0.264 | ms |
| random_4k_read_lat_p99 | 0.285 | ms |
| random_4k_write_bw | 558.4 | MB/s |
| random_4k_write_iops | 142,957 | IOPS |
| random_4k_write_lat_p95 | 0.289 | ms |
| random_4k_write_lat_p99 | 0.338 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_bw | 3,325.1 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_read_iops | 3,325 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p95 | 2.867 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p99 | 3.129 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_bw | 3,122.8 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_write_iops | 3,123 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p95 | 2.507 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p99 | 7.7 | ms |
CPU
| gzip_compress | 229.7 | MB/s |
| sysbench_multi | 4,268.14 | events/s |
| sysbench_single | 2,156.09 | events/s |
Memory
| memory_read_mb_s | 70,153.66 | MiB/s |
| memory_write_mb_s | 26,103.34 | MiB/s |
| OS | Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS |
| Kernel | 5.15.0-191-generic |
| Virtualization | kvm |
| CPU model | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ |
| vCPU | 2 |
| RAM (MB) | 1963 |
| Disk (GB) | 16.49 |
| Agent | 1.1.1 |
| Scoring | 2026.07b |
Exactly what the agent returned from this server — before rounding, with nothing edited out. Every number above is computed from this. Open separately →
Loading…
Could not load the data.
Plain-language summary
Ghostnet was tested on a 2 vCPU · 2 GB RAM instance in Frankfurt, Germany — here is what the numbers say. The standout here is memory — 96/100, backed by 70,154 MiB/s. A balanced profile like this works well for typical web workloads. The full breakdown, with every metric, is in the tabs above.