Edis vs Waicore
Real-test comparison — higher score is better on every metric (0–100).
Saint Petersburg
Frankfurt
| Edis | Metric | Waicore |
|---|---|---|
|
39.9
|
Overall |
69.6
|
|
73.4
|
Ping |
74.1
|
|
33.7
|
Network speed |
62.9
|
|
14.8
|
CPU |
71.6
|
|
33.8
|
Memory |
91.2
|
|
39.4
|
Disk |
60.1
|
| 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM | Configuration | 1 vCPU · 2 GB RAM |
On the overall score Waicore is ahead: 69.6 vs 39.9 out of 100 — a gap of 29.6 points. But the overall score blends five categories with different weights, and your workload may only care about one of them.
Waicore — on network speed, CPU, memory and disk. On ping the difference is within noise — treat them as equal there.
What that means in practice: for a database and write-heavy work — Waicore; for file delivery, streaming and backups — Waicore; for builds, encryption and compute-bound tasks — Waicore.
Where the numbers come from: the best published test of Edis was taken in Russia on the 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM plan, Waicore — in Germany on the 1 vCPU · 2 GB RAM plan. The locations differ, so compare ping and speed with care: they say as much about the route to our control endpoints as about the server itself.
Important: this compares the best published test of each provider, not an average across all their servers. Every result is a snapshot of one machine on the test date — on another node, or a month later, the numbers may differ. The scoring method and raw logs are public, so you can check them yourself.