Verified
3 September 2026
Tihost·4 vCPU · 4 GB RAM·Germany
Overall
55.6
/ 100
Scores
0–100 vs comparable servers
Ping
63.8/100
Speed
26.1/100
CPU
83.2/100
Memory
92.1/100
Disk
33.7/100
Category scores
Internet speed
Ping to control points
CPU performance
Memory bandwidth
Disk — random IOPS
Disk — sequential throughput
Disk latency (p95 / p99)
Network
| download_speed | 417.5 | Mbps |
| mtu | 1,500 | |
| ping_cloudflare | 7.897 | ms |
| ping_google | 7.384 | ms |
| ping_quad9 | 7.969 | ms |
| upload_speed | 576.1 | Mbps |
Disk
| random_4k_read_bw | 31.4 | MB/s |
| random_4k_read_iops | 8,035 | IOPS |
| random_4k_read_lat_p95 | 4.948 | ms |
| random_4k_read_lat_p99 | 6.193 | ms |
| random_4k_write_bw | 19.6 | MB/s |
| random_4k_write_iops | 5,024 | IOPS |
| random_4k_write_lat_p95 | 7.504 | ms |
| random_4k_write_lat_p99 | 11.338 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_bw | 5,999.6 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_read_iops | 6,000 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p95 | 2.638 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p99 | 4.882 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_bw | 1,845.3 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_write_iops | 1,845 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p95 | 8.716 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p99 | 12.255 | ms |
CPU
| gzip_compress | 218.6 | MB/s |
| sysbench_multi | 6,310.63 | events/s |
| sysbench_single | 1,712.24 | events/s |
Memory
| memory_read_mb_s | 49,947.83 | MiB/s |
| memory_write_mb_s | 24,658.94 | MiB/s |
| OS | AlmaLinux 10.1 (Heliotrope Lion) |
| Kernel | 6.12.0-124.55.1.el10_1.x86_64 |
| Virtualization | kvm |
| CPU model | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor |
| vCPU | 4 |
| RAM (MB) | 3652 |
| Disk (GB) | 139.93 |
| Agent | 1.1.1 |
| Scoring | 2026.07b |
Exactly what the agent returned from this server — before rounding, with nothing edited out. Every number above is computed from this. Open separately →
Loading…
Could not load the data.
Plain-language summary
Real measurements from a 4 vCPU · 4 GB RAM server at Tihost in Germany (Frankfurt), taken 3 September 2026. Performance leans hardest on memory — 49,948 MiB/s, 92/100. The weaker spot is disk I/O (8,035 IOPS (4K read)), so demanding disk I/O workloads are not its best fit. A balanced profile like this works well for typical web workloads. The full breakdown, with every metric, is in the tabs above.