Verified
17 July 2026
Netgrid Host·1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM·Bulgaria
Overall
38.0
/ 100
Scores
0–100 vs comparable servers
Ping
100.0/100
Speed
12.5/100
CPU
13.5/100
Memory
35.3/100
Disk
25.4/100
Category scores
Internet speed
Ping to control points
CPU performance
Memory bandwidth
Disk — random IOPS
Disk — sequential throughput
Disk latency (p95 / p99)
Network
| download_speed | 187.4 | Mbps |
| upload_speed | 319.1 | Mbps |
| ping_cloudflare | 1.308 | ms |
| ping_google | 0.748 | ms |
| ping_quad9 | 36.058 | ms |
| mtu | 1,500 |
Disk
| random_4k_read_iops | 37,800 | IOPS |
| random_4k_read_bw | 147.7 | MB/s |
| random_4k_read_lat_p95 | 0.766 | ms |
| random_4k_read_lat_p99 | 0.979 | ms |
| random_4k_write_iops | 10,213 | IOPS |
| random_4k_write_bw | 39.9 | MB/s |
| random_4k_write_lat_p95 | 1.253 | ms |
| random_4k_write_lat_p99 | 1.794 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_iops | 679 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_read_bw | 678.6 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p95 | 62.128 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p99 | 175.112 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_iops | 293 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_write_bw | 293 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p95 | 85.459 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p99 | 404.75 | ms |
CPU
| sysbench_single | 354.81 | events/s |
| sysbench_multi | 354.34 | events/s |
| gzip_compress | 108.4 | MB/s |
Memory
| memory_write_mb_s | 14,674.58 | MiB/s |
| memory_read_mb_s | 18,517.4 | MiB/s |
| OS | Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS |
| Kernel | 5.15.0-173-generic |
| Virtualization | kvm |
| CPU model | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ |
| vCPU | 1 |
| RAM (MB) | 957 |
| Disk (GB) | 9.71 |
| Agent | 1.1.1 |
| Scoring | 2026.07b |
Exactly what the agent returned from this server — before rounding, with nothing edited out. Every number above is computed from this. Open separately →
Loading…
Could not load the data.
Plain-language summary
Netgrid Host was tested on a 1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM instance in Sofia, Bulgaria — here is what the numbers say. Where it shines is connectivity: ping 0.7 ms, download 187 Mbps, for a score of 65 out of 100. Less impressive is the processor, where the numbers stay modest (354 events/s). For a VPN, tunnel or proxy this is a strong choice — those workloads live on the network, not the processor. Compare it with other providers in the same country to find your best fit.