Verified
14 July 2026
Digitalocean·1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM·India
Overall
58.2
/ 100
Scores
0–100 vs comparable servers
Ping
100.0/100
Speed
62.8/100
CPU
17.8/100
Memory
33.7/100
Disk
61.3/100
Category scores
Internet speed
Ping to control points
CPU performance
Memory bandwidth
Disk — random IOPS
Disk — sequential throughput
Disk latency (p95 / p99)
Network
| download_speed | 1,287.4 | Mbps |
| upload_speed | 509.1 | Mbps |
| ping_cloudflare | 1.331 | ms |
| ping_google | 13.421 | ms |
| ping_quad9 | 0.462 | ms |
| mtu | 1,500 |
Disk
| random_4k_read_iops | 81,417 | IOPS |
| random_4k_read_bw | 318 | MB/s |
| random_4k_read_lat_p95 | 0.627 | ms |
| random_4k_read_lat_p99 | 1.122 | ms |
| random_4k_write_iops | 58,348 | IOPS |
| random_4k_write_bw | 227.9 | MB/s |
| random_4k_write_lat_p95 | 0.979 | ms |
| random_4k_write_lat_p99 | 1.925 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_iops | 4,002 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_read_bw | 4,001.5 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p95 | 3.129 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p99 | 4.424 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_iops | 2,332 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_write_bw | 2,332.4 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p95 | 7.438 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p99 | 15.925 | ms |
CPU
| sysbench_single | 354.22 | events/s |
| sysbench_multi | 365.91 | events/s |
| gzip_compress | 173.2 | MB/s |
Memory
| memory_write_mb_s | 14,753.11 | MiB/s |
| memory_read_mb_s | 17,395.76 | MiB/s |
| OS | Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS |
| Kernel | 6.8.0-124-generic |
| Virtualization | kvm |
| CPU model | DO-Regular |
| vCPU | 1 |
| RAM (MB) | 961 |
| Disk (GB) | 23.17 |
| Agent | 1.1.0 |
| Scoring | 2026.07b |
Exactly what the agent returned from this server — before rounding, with nothing edited out. Every number above is computed from this. Open separately →
Loading…
Could not load the data.
Plain-language summary
On 14 July 2026 we ran the full test suite on Digitalocean (1 vCPU · 1 GB RAM) in India. Where it shines is the network path: ping 0.5 ms, download 1,287 Mbps, for a score of 85 out of 100. CPU is the soft side here — 366 events/s — worth keeping in mind. For a VPN, tunnel or proxy this is a strong choice — those workloads live on the network, not the processor. Compare it with other providers in the same country to find your best fit.