Overall
57.3
/ 100
Scores
0–100 vs comparable servers
Ping
59.1/100
Speed
25.2/100
CPU
64.1/100
Memory
45.5/100
Disk
87.7/100
Category scores
Internet speed
Ping to control points
CPU performance
Memory bandwidth
Disk — random IOPS
Disk — sequential throughput
Disk latency (p95 / p99)
Network
| download_speed | 396 | Mbps |
| upload_speed | 338.1 | Mbps |
| ping_cloudflare | 11.173 | ms |
| ping_google | 9.574 | ms |
| ping_quad9 | 10.028 | ms |
| mtu | 1,500 |
Disk
| random_4k_read_iops | 246,571 | IOPS |
| random_4k_read_bw | 963.2 | MB/s |
| random_4k_read_lat_p95 | 0.163 | ms |
| random_4k_read_lat_p99 | 0.187 | ms |
| random_4k_write_iops | 234,450 | IOPS |
| random_4k_write_bw | 915.8 | MB/s |
| random_4k_write_lat_p95 | 0.169 | ms |
| random_4k_write_lat_p99 | 0.187 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_iops | 4,772 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_read_bw | 4,771.8 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p95 | 1.958 | ms |
| sequential_1m_read_lat_p99 | 2.277 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_iops | 3,717 | IOPS |
| sequential_1m_write_bw | 3,717.2 | MB/s |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p95 | 2.507 | ms |
| sequential_1m_write_lat_p99 | 2.9 | ms |
CPU
| sysbench_single | 883.3 | events/s |
| sysbench_multi | 3,482.39 | events/s |
| gzip_compress | 341.7 | MB/s |
Memory
| memory_write_mb_s | 18,478.36 | MiB/s |
| memory_read_mb_s | 21,508.7 | MiB/s |
| OS | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS |
| Kernel | 7.0.0-22-generic |
| Virtualization | kvm |
| CPU model | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ |
| vCPU | 4 |
| RAM (MB) | 7936 |
| Disk (GB) | 39.28 |
| Agent | 1.1.0 |
| Scoring | 2026.07b |
Exactly what the agent returned from this server — before rounding, with nothing edited out. Every number above is computed from this. Open separately →
Loading…
Could not load the data.
Plain-language summary
We tested a 4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM server at Serva One in Italy end to end on 14 July 2026. Where it shines is storage: 246,571 IOPS (4K read), for a score of 88 out of 100. If anything holds it back, it is the network (ping 9.6 ms, download 396 Mbps). The disk result makes it a reasonable choice for storage-heavy or I/O-bound services. Compare it with other providers in the same country to find your best fit.